DISMAYED THAT CITY CLERK PAUL KAIN WAS FIRED!

I am dismayed by the reported firing of Municipal Clerk Paul Kain because I don\’t understand it.

No position could be more local; yet, announcement of it is front-page news, and its resolution is taking place at the highest levels of state government – through the Office of Local Government Services, in the cabinet-level Department of Community Affairs.

We are informed by the City that Mr. Kain has been unable to work for nearly six months, but from Mr. Kain we have heard nothing. At the same time, there is no shortage of comments from those who feel the Clerk should be removed from office due to his association with previous administrations. Surely, the potential vacating and filling of such an important city position deserves very thorough deliberation.

I can recall more than one highly charged public meeting where dozens of citizens, angered by what I was saying, would have drowned out my entire testimony if Secretary Kain had not maintained eye contact, letting me know I was still being taped for the permanent record. If nothing else, the loss of Mr. Kain will represent a loss of continuity, of contact with someone who still remembers some of the things we did, and why we did them. That should encourage us to take considered, measured steps to be sure the disposition of his case is just and compassionate, and benefits the whole city.

Steve Roche, Gloucester City (source Gloucester City News)

Related articles by Zemanta
\"Reblog

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

Spring Snow Goose Conservation Order for NJ

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

WHAT HAPPENED TO BOBBY DORNBACH?

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

Who Gains Most from Bubbles and Bailouts?

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

Mayor William James State of the City Address

GLOUCESTER CITY NJ (January 6, 2010)-Well it’s time to update the citizens of Gloucester City as to the progress of this administration over the past year as well as to advise what we expect to occur over the next twelve months.\"City%20seal\"

First we intend on continuing to video the council meetings and expect this year to spend $25,000 in UEZ grant monies to upgrade our equipment for better home viewing and digital retention of events.

A three year project of bringing TD bank to town has been accomplished. The entire Cumberland and Broadway area has been given a wonderful facelift. We will be addressing the traffic light situation on Broadway with the County, as well as residential parking permits for the affected neighborhood.

The Broadway Street scape project is nearing completion with the upcoming installation of freestanding decorative lighting, electrification of poles, tree planting and the installation of benches and waste receptacles. We have also been awarded monies in the amount of $270,000 for phase two of this project and this year will be performing similar improvements from Monmouth Street north to Hudson St.

Street scape Projects will begin on Market St. From King to the new school site and on Burlington St. From Market St. North to Hudson St. The money for these projects has been awarded in the amount of $485,649 for Market street and $523,841for Burlington Street the contractor has been selected through the lawful bid process.

In an aggressive act to control our future destiny as it relates to our most valuable life sustaining resource, the construction of our new water treatment plant has begun and completion is expected late spring or early summer.

Our yearly rental property inspections have been conducted over the past two years with much

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

Margaret T Aurand, formerly of Gloucester City, Memorial Service Saturday January 9

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.

Letters: Regarding the Snow Removal Ticket Issue

I recently had the opportunity to speak with Gloucester City Police Chief George Berglund and Housing Inspector Joe Stecklair about the questionable ticketing of \"6a00d8341bf7d953ef011570df48d6970c-800wi\" preselected property owners and/or residents. A total of 54 properties were selected for tickets.

Ordinance 73-15 addresses the issue of snow removal from sidewalks. The ordinance says \”It is the duty of the police officers of Gloucester City, to make complaint against any person or persons who violate73-15 of this ordinance\”.

Chief Berglund acknowledged that he did not assign any police officers to perform the required duty of the ordinance nor did he know how the time was established to start the count down for the violation.

Chief Housing Inspector Stecklair acknowledged that he volunteered his services to \”Be the Eyes and Ears of the Police Department\”.

It was his position that \”something needed to be done to ensure safe passage of children to school\”.

Stecklair then assigned Inspector Wagner to police the King St, Market St, Monmouth St, and Broadway corridors. When asked why Wagner listed nine owners not part of his instruction, he speculated that they may have been phoned in by complaining neighbors and Wagner added them to the list being forwarded to the police department.

When asked why such a small group of properties were selected instead of citing all properties city wide Mr. Stecklair said \”it is like catching speeders, you can’t catch them all\”.

I feel the properties weren’t going anywhere and could have been covered city wide.

The ordinance allows twelve hours to comply. Stecklair feels this is more than adequate time to comply. Berglund felt 24 hours may be more appropriate. All parties agree the ordinance needs to be rewritten.

I feel \”No rule is so general that it is without exception\” and the exceptions should be included in the ordinance.

Chief Berglund stated that letters have been sent out to administratively dismiss the tickets. The letter finds you guilty and warns all recipients that any future violation will be fully prosecuted and shall not be dismissed.

So the indication is that even if you would have been able to prove wrongful citation or prejudicial selection you are still guilty and lose the opportunity to have a future offense dismissed that will be afforded to others not preselected by Inspectors Stecklair and Wagner.

One question that comes to mind is what happened to \”fair and equal treatment under the law\”?

My letter is not intended to be the position of our public servants. It is therefore suggested that the city post the ordinance in question on its web site and that any/all named individuals post clarifications to my letter if they differ with any of the foregoing content. It will certainly improve communication between the city administration and the taxpayers.

signed A ClearysNoteBook (CNB) Reader

CNB Note: More details on this topic will be forthcoming in Monday’s Tips and Snippets column.

Related articles by Zemanta
\"Reblog

This post was imported from a legacy archive. Please excuse any formatting inconsistencies.