Philadelphia CBP Seizes $113,000 in Atlanta-bound Counterfeit Designer Brand Handbags

March 19, 2020

PHILADELPHIA

– U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers seized a shipment of 32 counterfeit designer brand handbags March 10 that arrived in Philadelphia in an express delivery parcel from Turkey. If genuine, the handbags, which were destined to an address in Atlanta, would have had a manufacturer suggested retail price of $113,683.

This is the second significant shipment of designer brand handbags that CBP officers recently seized in Philadelphia, following the

$317,080 in counterfeit designer brand products

officers seized February 24.

CBP officers initially examined this latest shipment on February 26. The shipment contained 31 Louis Vuitton handbags and one Gucci handbag. Officers detained the shipment due to the poor quality and packaging of the merchandise.

CBP officers worked with CBP’s Consumer Products and Mass Merchandising

Centers for Excellence and Expertise

, the agency’s trade experts and verified through the trademark holder that the products were counterfeit.

CBP protects businesses and consumers every day through an aggressive

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) enforcement program

. Importation of counterfeit merchandise can cause significant revenue loss, damage the U.S. economy, and threaten the health and safety of the American people. On a typical day in 2019, CBP officers seized $4.3 million worth of products with Intellectual Property Rights violations. Learn more about what CBP did during \”

A Typical Day

\” in 2019.

“Customs and Border Protection officers encounter a wide variety of counterfeit consumer goods, like these trademark-infringing products, and we continue to work with our trade and consumer safety partners to identify and seize counterfeit products,” said Joseph Martella, Area Port Director for the Area Port of Philadelphia. “CBP urges consumers to protect their families and their wallets by purchasing authentic goods from reputable vendors.”

CBP officers and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigation (HSI) agents seized 27,599 shipments containing counterfeit goods in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. The total estimated manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of the seized goods, had they been genuine, increased to over $1.5 billion from nearly $1.4 billion in FY 2018.

Additionally, HSI arrested 256 individuals, obtained 197 indictments, and received 157 convictions related to intellectual property crimes during FY 2019.

The People’s Republic of China remained the primary source economy for seized counterfeit and pirated goods, accounting for a total estimated MSRP value of over $1 billion or 66 percent of the estimated MSRP value of all IPR seizures.

CBP\’s

border security mission

is led at ports of entry by CBP officers from the Office of Field Operations.  Please visit

CBP Ports of Entry

to learn more about how CBP’s Office of Field Operations secures our nation’s borders. Learn more about CBP at

www.CBP.gov

.

Follow the Director of CBP’s Baltimore Field Office on Twitter at

@DFOBaltimore

and on Instagram at

@dfobaltimore

for breaking news, current events, human interest stories and photos.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is the unified border agency within the Department of Homeland Security charged with the management, control and protection of our nation\’s borders at and between official ports of entry. CBP is charged with securing the borders of the United States while enforcing hundreds of laws and facilitating lawful trade and travel.

For Every 50 Smokers – One Non-Smoker Dies from Secondhand Smoke Exposure

SOURCE:

Mount Sinai Health System

Roughly 50 lifetime smokers are associated with the death of one non-smoker, according to a large-scale data analysis.

Why this research is interesting:

To get a better understanding of the scale of harm inflicted by smokers, researchers used a large-scale data set to develop a “secondhand smoke index” that calculated the number of smokers associated with the death of a non-smoker in different regions of the world. The findings assign responsibility of harm to

smokers, with the hope that this analysis will change their habits, and has the potential to change smoking policies to protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke exposure.

How the research was conducted:

Researchers from Mount Sinai Heart and VU University Medical Center Amsterdam in the Netherlands analyzed a large-scale dataset on global smoking behavior from

“Our World in Data

.” This is comprised of several different, high quality datasets from a number of sources including World Health Organization, Global Burden of Disease Reports, and International Mortality and Smoking Statistics. Data included the number of active smokers and secondhand smoke victims (those who died from premature death due to secondhand smoke) from 1990 – 2016. Researchers compared World Bank regions – North America, South Asia, Middle East and North Africa, East Asia and Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America and Caribbean.

They tabulated the number of lifetime smokers in each country and the premature deaths related to second hand smoke in that country (average lifetime smoking was set at 24 years based on epidemiological data). The analysis also included the average number of cigarettes smokers used. Researchers calculated the number of pack years associated with death in one non-smoker through second hand smoke, the so-called pack-year index (PYI).  They also calculated the number of lifetime smokers associated with the death of one nonsmoker, i.e. the second hand smoke index.

What the results show

: Researchers calculated that in 2016, 52 current lifetime smokers were associated with the death of one non-smoker worldwide. This is an increase from 1990, when 31 lifetime smokers were associated with the death of one non-smoker, and reflects the relative effectiveness of anti-tobacco measures like smoking bans in restaurants. The secondhand smoke index was more favorable in North America—around 90 smokers related to one death—where there are more protective laws against smoking in public area. Regions like the Middle East or Southeast Asia had less favorable numbers—around 40 smokers to one death—due to minimum or no protective measures.

Why this research is important:

These results could help policy makers to better understand the scale of harm inflicted by secondhand smoke and develop new measures that will protect non-smokers. This is especially important considering children exposed to secondhand smoke are at increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome, acute respiratory infections, and asthma. Even a low dose of secondhand smoke can damage the cardiovascular system and long-term exposure can lead to a 20-30 percent increase in risk for heart attack and lung cancer.

Quotes:

“This study demonstrates the devastating effect of second-hand smoke.  We hope that attributing harm directly to smokers will help influence public opinion against secondhand smoke exposure and enthuse governments to enforce stringent anti-tobacco control. We suggest that the secondhand smoke index may be used as a benchmark for effectiveness of protection against tobacco in countries, and help governments to shape their anti-tobacco policies,” says Jagat Narula, MD, PhD.

“The problem is exaggerated in the rapidly developing economies which are lacking effective protection of non-smokers.  But this research demonstrates that even in modern states there is a lot to gain when it comes to strengthening policies to protect nonsmokers, especially children. For example, it should not be allowed for parents to smoke inside their cars with them,” explains lead author Leonard Hofstra, MD, PhD, Professor of Cardiology at VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.

About the Mount Sinai Health System

The Mount Sinai Health System is New York City\’s largest academic medical system, encompassing eight hospitals, a leading medical school, and a vast network of ambulatory practices throughout the greater New York region. Mount Sinai is a national and international source of unrivaled education, translational research and discovery, and collaborative clinical leadership ensuring that we deliver the highest quality care—from prevention to treatment of the most serious and complex human diseases. The Health System includes more than 7,200 physicians and features a robust and continually expanding network of multispecialty services, including more than 400 ambulatory practice locations throughout the five boroughs of New York City, Westchester, and Long Island. The Mount Sinai Hospital is ranked No. 14 on

U.S. News & World Report

\’s \”Honor Roll\” of the Top 20 Best Hospitals in the country and the Icahn School of Medicine as one of the Top 20 Best Medical Schools in country. Mount Sinai Health System hospitals are consistently ranked regionally by specialty by

U.S. News & World Report

.

For more information, visit

https://www.mountsinai.org

New Brunswick Police Halt Gun Permits! But Reverse Decision After Visit from NJ2AS

SOURCE

New Jersey Second Amendment Society

New Brunswick, NJ

–The city of New Brunswick, NJ, halted the ability for residents to apply for a firearm permit claiming the fingerprinting company was closed. We stopped by the police department to investigate and quickly discovered the lies.

RELATED:

CRIME

HUNTING AND FISHING

PENNSYLVANIA GOP: DID YOU SEE THE HEADLINES?

Did you see the

headlines

?!!  Republicans swept three special elections for the Pennsylvania House!

The March 17 Special Elections weren’t victories won by the luck of the Irish.  They were won by

Gloucestercitynews.net files

great candidates with strong messages and great turnout. We had a lot working against us: Democrats out spending us,

a last minute lawsuit to delay the election

, and the COVID-19 virus.

Politics PA

wrote:

“Although each district was previously represented by a Republican prior to the vacancy, not all of the races were viewed as clear Republican holds.”

The Pennsylvania Capital-Star

observed:

“The wins came across the commonwealth, from suburban Philadelphia to old milltowns south of Pittsburgh to a rural district in western Pennsylvania, and left the GOP confident for the rest of 2020 — including up to November’s critical presidential election…Two looked in play for Democrats, but the party did not draw out enough former Blue Dogs in southwestern Pennsylvania or Trump-skeptical suburbanites outside Philadelphia to flip a district.”

The Bucks County Courier-Times

noted an important fact as well:

“The Republican Party noted the Democrats spent more than $900,000 but lost the three races in the special election.”

PA Post

added:

“Tuesday’s turnout met or slightly exceeded election directors’ expectations of between 10 and 15 percent (turnout is typically quite low for special elections).

Turnout in the 8th District was in that range in its Butler County section (11 percent) and higher in the Mercer County part (17 percent). In Westmoreland County, the 58th saw a 20 percent turnout, up from 17 percent for its last special four years ago for the adjacent state House district.

Turnout was 20 percent in 18th District, which lies entirely in Bensalem Township (Bucks County), versus 12 percent at the county’s last special in 2009, according to elections director Thomas Freitag.”

Even RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel celebrated our victories:

Our message is reaching across party lines and pulling in unlikely voters, but we’re not sitting back! The April 28th Primary Election will be here quick, and we want to encourage you, your friends and your neighbors to register Republican! Click

here

to learn more on how you can register online, and

here

to apply for a new Mail-in ballot.

Working together we’ll re-elect President Trump, win the statewide row offices, turn Congress Red, and expand our state legislative majorities.

Onward to Victory!

Chairman Lawrence Tabas

Republican Party of Pennsylvania

NJBIA Coronavirus Survey Finds Most Businesses in Need of Assistance

A survey conducted by the New Jersey Business & Industry Association finds that 93% of members who responded either are already negatively impacted by the coronavirus health crisis or anticipate being negatively impacted in the near future.

At the same time, most respondents say they will need to cut costs due to coronavirus-related hardships, including a reduction of staff, hours, benefits and other remedies.

Members also described in detail their most critical issues, showing a vast number of impacts from businesses from varying industries.

\”The concerns of our members are extremely clear during this unprecedented time,\” said NJBIA President and CEO Michele Siekerka. \”They are highly concerned about the overall stability of their businesses and the welfare of their employees.

\”We are pleased to see the efforts of our policymakers and our state agencies, thus far, to address the economic impacts the coronavirus is having on our job creators and their workers. As these plans and protections are gathered and expedited, it is critically important to recognize how the uncertainty and vulnerability of our employers impacts our overall economy in New Jersey.\”

Survey results

When asked to what extent has your business been negatively impacted by the coronavirus:

54% said they have already been negatively impacted

39% said they anticipate being negatively impacted in the near future

7% said they do not anticipate being negatively impacted

When asked how they will respond to the negative business impacts caused by the coronavirus (respondents could select any or all options that applied):

40% said they will need to reduce staff

37% said they will need to reduce employee hours

12% said they will need to reduce benefits

24% said they will do nothing

Another 37% listed \”other\” additional remedies to accommodate the impacts including: needing to temporarily close; relying on personal savings and credit to pay bills; negotiating with vendors, landlords and utility companies; adjusting service levels; reducing expenses; increasing spending on cleaning and disinfecting; increasing remote working.

In separate questions, a majority of respondents said they were unsure, at this juncture, whether they would need gap loans or waivers of workplace compliance requirements due to the fiscal impacts brought on by the response to the coronavirus.

Most critical issues

NJBIA also asked members to explain what the most critical issues to their business are as the association works with policymakers and state agencies on responses to address the economic impacts of the coronavirus.

A few notable entries from the hundreds of responses included:

\”Trying to keep up with payroll, taxes, health ins., vehicle ins., fuel, worker\’s comp ins., vehicle payments, vehicle registrations, and all State associated fees with licenses and registrations. If we can\’t access the customer\’s property and/or an employee gets the illness, this will put us out of business.\”

\”Besides health of employees, worry about supply chain interruptions. If say UPS goes down, how will I deliver products? What if my suppliers are closed?\”

\”Unable to provide home based services as usual.\”

\”Business customers and my employees being able to work if kids are home from school.\”

\”Personal protective equipment for my team of healthcare workers. We can\’t get level 3 masks right now.\”

\”Cash flow if sales decline.\”

\”The phone has stopped ringing, people are not spending money.\”

\”Access to short-term financing.\”

\”As a supplier of printed material for many local NJ businesses, we are expecting a significant loss of revenue due to cancellations of events, trade shows, etc.\”

These survey results were fielded from 336 respondents from March 13-15. NJBIA will keep the survey open to its members to acquire additional input.

\”We want to ensure that we are relaying these impacts in real time and working with our members and all levels of state government to bring the assistance needed to secure New Jersey\’s workforce and economy,\” Siekerka said. \”We also continue to update our comprehensive resource page at

www.njbia.org/coronavirus

.\”

Doctors and Nurses Grow Desperate for Protective Gear

Health care workers at a drive-through coronavirus testing site in Arlington, Virginia, on Wednesday. The CDC recently issued guidelines allowing surgical masks to be worn instead of N95 respirators in many cases. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

by

Topher Sanders

,

Maya Miller

,

Lexi Churchill

and

David Armstrong

This story is co-published with

The Times-Picayune

and

The Advocate

.

March 19, 2020-

Emergency room physician John Gavin can’t identify the exact patient from whom he contracted the coronavirus, but he’s confident he picked up the illness working one of his 12-hour shifts in Amite, Louisiana’s small, rural emergency room.

“There were just so many people who had so many vague symptoms that any of them could have been that person,” he said. “We see a lot of viral-type illnesses.”

But Gavin, 69, is certain that before his coronavirus diagnosis on March 9, officials at Hood Memorial Hospital, where he works, hadn’t made any specific changes to protocols or procedures to protect doctors and nurses from contracting the disease.

“Not at that point they hadn’t,” said Gavin, who is recovering from the disease caused by the virus. “I don’t know if they’ve done anything since then. But during that time there was nothing other than advice to wash your hands frequently and ‘we’ll try to keep the water on,’” a reference to a water cutoff that had taken place in early March.

Help Us Report On Coronavirus

Are you a public health worker, medical provider, elected official, patient or other COVID-19 expert?

Help make sure our journalism is responsible and focused on the right issues.

Gavin also said the ER at the time didn’t have gowns or N95 respirator masks designed to protect medical providers from airborne particles and liquids.

“No, no, we didn’t have any of that,” he said. “They offered us paper face masks, that’s it.”

Gavin later joked that wearing a paper mask was like “putting up chicken wire on your windows to keep the mosquitos out.”

Amid the response to the coronavirus, officials are particularly concerned about doctors and nurses getting sick themselves and being unable to care for others. There is no official data accounting for the number of health care workers who have been exposed or infected so far, but providers worry about what will happen as supplies runs out. On Tuesday, The Washington Post

reported

that at least 60 providers had tested positive for COVID-19. In Italy,

data published in JAMA

shows that 9% of those infected are health care workers.

Officials with Hood Memorial Hospital declined interview requests but said in a statement that the facility has protective gear available for staff. The statement also said there was no evidence Gavin contracted the disease at the hospital. The statement quotes the hospital’s CEO, Mike Whittington, saying that “no patient or employee that Hood is monitoring has developed any symptoms of COVID-19 in the eight days since their interaction with the provider.”

Confusion and concerns around supplies extend well beyond Amite. Given the nationwide supply shortages, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently downgraded its guidelines for how health workers should protect themselves, allowing them to use surgical masks instead of N95 respirator masks in many cases. And this week, the CDC went further, publishing directions that providers “might use homemade masks” like a bandanna or scarf if no masks are available.

Gavin said he was unable to call in sick in the days before his diagnosis because of a shortage of doctors in the area. The small hospital Gavin works at is about 60 miles northeast from Baton Rouge and serves a wide area that stretches to neighboring Mississippi.

“So I went in and worked that shift,” he said. “I’m sure I exposed everybody I saw.”

And on one of the days immediately prior to Gavin having symptoms, there was a period of time where the water in Amite was shut off and he and his colleagues were unable to wash their hands for hours. They relied on hand sanitizer during the outage.

Sick doctors and nurses cause a ripple effect.

Beth Oller, a family physician in rural Rooks County, Kansas, said the five doctors who treat patients in her area are working together to minimize the risk of any of them getting sick with the coronavirus.

“We are terrified of this taking out providers or our nurses,” she said.

The ripple effect of one or two health care workers in the county being sidelined by the virus would be devastating. Oller said she is one of two doctors in the area who delivers babies. Her husband, one of the four other doctors in the county, also cares for patients at the area nursing homes and heads up the local EMS service. There are only a handful of X-ray technicians at the hospital and a small number of nurses.

Oller said the local hospital has a limited supply of masks and gowns. The burden on the local doctors is already beginning to increase because of the virus. The county hospital depends on out-of-area emergency room providers to help cover weekend shifts. One of those, a nurse practitioner based three hours away in Topeka, informed the hospital this week that her travel was being limited by her own hospital because of the virus and she might not be available to cover shifts in Rooks County, Oller said.

Reduced standards due to gear shortages are putting front-line health workers at additional risk.

Medical providers in Washington, Ohio, New York, Connecticut, Oregon, Illinois, Texas and California told ProPublica that in the past week, hospitals have changed recommendations around protective equipment. The moves come after the CDC modified its guidance March 10 on the kinds of precautions health care workers should take in light of supply shortages.

Doctors and nurses in these states said their hospitals initially told them to use sealed face masks like N95s when treating patients presenting COVID-19 symptoms. Providers are now being told to use surgical masks when interacting with a symptomatic patient. In the past week, their hospitals have placed N95s in locked cabinets to make sure they are available for cases requiring intubation.

Read More

Are Hospitals Near Me Ready for Coronavirus? Here Are Nine Different Scenarios.

How soon regions run out of hospital beds depends on how fast the novel coronavirus spreads and how many open beds they had to begin with. Here’s a look at the whole country. You can also search for your region.

Some hospitals have gone further in loosening restrictions, recommending staff reuse disposable masks. Medical providers on the front lines are concerned by this move, saying masks are only intended to be used once because the risk of contamination increases as they are reused.

“It’s like doing surgery with gloves on one patient and using the same gloves for another surgery,” said John Pearson, an emergency room nurse at Highland Hospital, a public hospital in Oakland, California. The hospital has told staff to reuse surgical masks and place them in paper bags between patients. He said a few of his colleagues have already gotten sick. “It goes against all our training and all the standards and practices we’ve been drilled in year over year.”

Reusing disposable masks is bad practice, but it is understandable in the current situation, experts said. Hospital administrators see reusing masks as a necessary move given the current shortages and the fact that the virus has not hit its peak. The CDC has not issued guidance around mask reuse.

Of the 65 medical providers who

wrote into ProPublica

this week, 31 said they felt as though they were being asked to take measures that made them uncomfortable, such as reusing protective masks. All but two respondents cited supply shortages as a factor.

A number of hospitals and clinics have advised staff they have less than two weeks of supplies and don’t know when additional orders will be fulfilled, according to emails reviewed by ProPublica. In a private Facebook group, doctors and medical staff are sharing tips for building their own masks from materials they have at home or are ordering from Amazon. After reading through the posts, someone in the group explained they sent a note to a state ACLU chapter to outline conditions and ask if doctors have any recourse to keep themselves safe.

“There is a massive shortage and a dramatic lowering of the quality of care,” Pearson said. “We’ve seen our health care system fall, and we’re paying a huge price.”

Alameda Health Systems, which oversees the hospital, did not respond to questions about supplies and requests for comment.

Protective gear shortages are a national problem.

“This is all driven by shortages of protective gear,” said Dr. Robert Harrison, the director of the University of California San Francisco’s Occupational Health Services. In the United States, surges in demand, lackluster preparation and some overseas suppliers shutting down as their countries grapple with the virus have contributed to the shortages.

Vice President Mike Pence, who is leading the U.S. response to COVID-19, has said a handful of manufacturers are ramping up their production efforts for masks, gloves and gowns. The CDC also has begun fulfilling orders by states requesting masks from the country’s Strategic National Stockpile, which has less than 5% of the 300 million masks public officials estimate the country will need.

Get Our Top Investigations

Subscribe to the Big Story newsletter.

Email address

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google

Privacy Policy

and

Terms of Service

apply.

Representatives of hospitals and nursing homes shared concerns about a shortage of supplies on a call Monday hosted by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. On the call, a high-level official from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services gave an update on the supply shortage and the hope for replenishment.

The strategic national stockpile “has a significant but, quite frankly, very small percentage of what is needed in today’s crisis,” the HHS official said. Federal officials are coordinating their capabilities with those in the private sector, including group purchasing organizations, distributors and manufacturers, “to basically pull all this together,” he said. Proposals include purchasing a large number of N95 masks, for example, and working with the CDC “to extend the reuse” of what have traditionally been single-use products, he said.

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump invoked the

Defense Production Act

, which allows for the large-scale diversion of materials and facilities “when national defense needs cannot otherwise be satisfied in a timely fashion.” In recent days, senators and local officials had urged the administration to invoke the legislation that Congress first passed in 1950, during the Korean War.

Front-line health care workers are being pushed to the brink of quitting.

Several health care workers told ProPublica they are already weighing the possibility of quitting if their workplace runs out of protective gear.

A nurse practitioner working in northeast Connecticut says her office has already canceled nonessential surgeries and procedures. Staff are now relying on telehealth, in which they communicate with patients largely over the phone or online, to keep people from coming to the facility.

She has five N95 masks stowed away for patients still coming in. She says she’ll reuse them until they’re “soiled or ruined,” but if her office ultimately runs out of protective gear, she will not come in.

“Zero PPE means zero providers,” she said, referring to personal protective equipment. “And I know that my other colleagues feel the same way.”

One intensive care nurse in Columbus, Ohio, says she has an underlying lung disease that puts her especially at risk for COVID-19. During her latest shift this week, she was told her hospital was on its last few boxes of N95 masks. Nurses were hiding the remaining gear and putting their initials on the masks they reused throughout the day.

She says if she is asked to care for potential COVID-19 patients without the proper protection, she will request a different assignment. Still, the mere risk of possible exposure given her condition scares her husband.

“It’s something that’s on the table that we are going to keep discussing, which worries me because I don’t know if people are going to hire nurses that quit at the time they’re needed,” she said.

Marshall Allen contributed reporting.

republished here by

The Gloucestercitynews.net

SOURCE:

ProPublica — Investigative Journalism and News in the Public Interest

Frederick J. Lesser, of West Deptford; Coached and Umpired Youth Sports, Dupont Retiree

Fred Lesser

WEST DEPTFORD NJ–Fred Lesser (81) a West Deptford, NJ resident for 53 years passed away on March 16, 2020, surrounded by his loving family. Fred was born in Brooklyn, NY, moved throughout the years and attended Clayton High School graduating with the Class of 1958. After retiring from DuPont in Deepwater, NJ, in 1993 he became a school bus driver until 2017. He loved coaching midget football, basketball & baseball in the 60\’s, then experienced umpiring Little League baseball and softball which became his joy until 2017. Fred attended Kemble Memorial UMC, was a member of the Woodbury Poly Pros and was also a proud volunteer on the USS New Jersey BB-62.

Fred is survived by his loving wife Carol (nee Brant) of 58½ years; loving daughters Karlie Pollitt (Mike) of Gloucester City and Janet Sheehan (dear friend Mark) of Bellmawr; 3 grandchildren Drew Pollitt, Brianna Pollitt & Patrick Sheehan; sisters Marilyn Sweeney of Limerick, PA & Joyce Penrod (Larry) of Bushnell, FL; many dear in-laws, cousins, nieces, nephews, great friends and the best neighbors.

He is predeceased by his parents Bill & Goldie Lesser and 3 sisters, Carolyn Groff of TN, Frances Parker of Wales, UK & Gail Pinto-Sanders of FL.

Friends and relatives are invited to his viewing on Saturday, March 21, 2020, from 11am to 12pm at the BARCLAY FUNERAL HOME, 208 Maple Street, Clayton, NJ 08312, followed by a service at 12pm. As the Lesser family, we understand the precautions being taken at this time which could prevent a visit personally; however, being with us in spirit and through thoughts and prayers are very much appreciated. In lieu of flowers, please make donations to your favorite charity in Fred\’s name. Please sign the guestbook or send condolences at BarclayFuneralHome.net.

Formula One generates over $1.2bn in sponsorship

Despite the switch from free-to-air to pay-TV reducing global audience numbers in 2019, says GlobalData’s Sportcal

According to the 2019 F1 Audience report, Formula One has seen a 3.9% decline in unique viewers globally, with audiences falling to 471 million following the move from free to air to pay TV. Yet, this iconic racing series is growing audiences in the US, Middle East and Asia and still remains highly attractive to sponsors worldwide, with companies spending an estimate of $1.2bn annually on partnerships, according to Sportcal, a GlobalData company.

image courtesy of Formula 1

Sportcal’s latest report,

‘The Business of Formula One 2020’

, reveals that technology companies make up the majority of team sponsors across the grid, accounting for almost 20% of all team partners – given their ability to aid and enhance performance. Moreover, automotive brands are unsurprisingly heavily involved, making up 17.6% of all deals while clothing and accessories brands are the third most common sector sponsoring the sport, accounting for 13.5% of all deals.

Conrad Wiacek, Head of Analysis & Consulting at Sportcal, a GlobalData company, says: \”While the sport of F1 cannot claim to have the audience it did back in the mid-90s, thanks to the sport going for the money provided by pay-TV as opposed to free-to-air, brands are still as keen as ever to partner with the premier motor racing series as they see value in associating with the top tier of motorsport.”

Despite the decrease in viewers, the motorsport series still has a sizeable global audience, and this continues to grow across the Middle East and Asia.

Wiacek adds: “In 2019, both the US and China had a respective 7% and 5% increase of viewers according to F1’s annual viewership report. Highlighting the appeal to brands that through this partnership, there may be opportunities to reach strategic target markets.”

The return to prominence of some iconic teams such as McLaren, who with 41 individual partners are the most sponsored team in the paddock – ahead of Renault and Ferrari, who respectively have 32 and 28 individual team deals. McLaren still have no title sponsor, they have made a conscious decision to focus on developing multiple partnerships with brands who can either provide financial or technical support to aid their progress back to the front of the grid.

Wiacek continues: “While McLaren do not generate the same amount of revenue from their sponsors – $86.35m according to GlobalData’s Sportcal Intelligence Center, compared to Ferrari who lead the way with $254.1m thanks to their title sponsorship with Phillip Morris – they are well placed to lean on their partners to help them get back to winning ways.”

CDC Report: PA and NJ Up To 149 Lung Injuries Linked to Vaping

The Center Square

(The Center Square) – The number of lung injury hospitalization cases linked to vaping in Pennsylvania now numbers as high as 149 as of Feb. 25,

according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

.

Nationally, the number of cases involving hospitalizations due to e-cigarette use continues to decline after peaking in September of last year, the CDC reports. Patient reports show that black-market vaping products containing THC – the psychoactive component of cannabis – have played a major role in the outbreak.

Among the 100 to 149 cases reported in Pennsylvania, two deaths have been reported, according to the CDC.

Vitamin E acetate, which commonly does no harm when taken as a supplement, has also been linked to the lung injuries, the agency’s data shows. Medical research indicates it can disrupt lung functioning when inhaled.

In total, there have been 68 deaths associated with the vaping incidents in 29 states as well as the District of Columbia, the CDC reports. In addition, the total number of hospitalizations from such vaping activities is now 2,807, the report says.

Hospitalizations Related to Vaping, State by State

State

Frequency

(# of Cases)

Deaths Reported

Alabama

10-49

4

Alaska

1-9

0

Arizona

10-49

0

Arkansas

10-49

0

California

150-199

4

Colorado

1-9

0

Connecticut

50-99

2

Delaware

10-49

2

Florida

100-149

2

Georgia

10-49

6

Hawaii

1-9

0

Idaho

10-49

0

Illinois

200-249

5

Indiana

100-149

6

Iowa

50-99

0

Kansas

10-49

2

Kentucky

10-49

2

Louisiana

10-49

2

Maine

1-9

0

Maryland

50-99

0

Massachusetts

100-149

5

Michigan

50-99

3

Minnesota

100-149

3

Mississippi

10-49

2

Missouri

10-49

2

Montana

1-9

4

Nebraska

10-49

4

Nevada

1-9

0

New Hampshire

1-9

0

New Jersey

100-149

4

New Mexico

10-49

0

New York

150-199

4

North Carolina

50-99

0

North Dakota

1-9

0

Ohio

10-49

0

Oklahoma

1-9

0

Oregon

10-49

2

Pennsylvania

100-149

2

Rhode Island

1-9

2

South Carolina

10-49

2

South Dakota

10-49

0

Tennessee

50-99

2

Texas

200-249

4

Utah

100-149

2

Vermont

1-9

0

Virginia

50-99

2

Washington

10-49

2

Washington, D.C.

1-9

2

West Virginia

10-49

0

Wisconsin

50-99

0

Wyoming

1-9

0

Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

published here with permission of

The Center Square

$30.1 million in FY2020 Freight Impact Grants for Improvements to Heavy Truck Routes

(Trenton) –

The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) today announced $30.1 million in grants as part of the Local Freight Impact Fund program that help counties and municipalities provide for the safe movement of large truck traffic.

“These Local Freight Impact Fund grants allow counties and municipalities to make critical improvements to truck routes that are essential to keeping our regional economy thriving,” NJDOT Commissioner Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti said. “New Jersey roads and bridges carry a tremendous amount of commercial truck traffic every day and we are using funds generated through the gas tax to make sure our infrastructure can handle the load.”

The Local Freight Impact Fund (LFIF) is a competitive $30.1 million program, which was created as part of Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) reauthorization in October 2016. This is the third year that grants have been made under this program.

NJDOT received 45 applications requesting more than $73.3 million for the FY2020 LFIF Program. Of the applications received, there are 17 grants being awarded.  Those grants are being distributed to 10 municipalities and 6 counties, with one county receiving two grants. Of the 17 projects, there are two Truck Safety and Mobility projects, two New Construction projects and 13 Pavement Preservation projects. Click here for a

full list of project awards

.

The program helps New Jersey’s municipalities fund projects that emphasize and enhance the safe movement of large truck traffic, renew aging structures that carry large truck traffic, promote economic development, and support new transportation opportunities.

Under the program, projects that fall into four categories are eligible for funding: bridge preservation, new construction, pavement preservation, and truck safety and mobility. The grants are administered by the NJDOT Division of Local Aid and Economic Development. NJDOT staff evaluate projects using a variety of criteria including: existing conditions, overall traffic volume, percentage of large truck traffic, crash frequency, connectivity to freight nodes, among others.

For NJDOT news follow us on Twitter

@NJDOT_info

and on the

NJDOT Facebook page

.