Lawsuit seeks return of \’fair-share\’ fees paid by Pennsylvania state non-union workers

Members of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees union listen to AFSCME Council 31 executive director Henry Bayer speak during a forum in this 2012 file photo. Seth Perlman | AP file photo

By Steve Bittenbender |

The Center Square

Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.

If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.

The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.

Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.

If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.

The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.

One of the plaintiffs in the case is David Schaszberger. He served as a statistical analyst for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry for a decade but voluntarily chose not to join the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 13, the local union representing more than 65,000 public-sector workers.

The Liberty Justice Center estimates Schaszberger had to pay the union more than $4,000 in order to hold his job.

The lawsuit comes in the wake of a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, an Illinois case filed by the same groups, that overturned the practice of public-sector unions collecting what they called “fair share” fees from workers who opted not to join. The unions maintained the fees were necessary to cover the costs of negotiating collective bargaining agreements, which covered both union and nonunion employees alike.

“The Supreme Court has already decided with us and with the workers,” said Brian Kelsey, a Liberty Justice Center senior attorney. “Now we’re just asking the courts to make the union pay up for what they took.”

In the 5-4 decision, the nation’s top court ruled such forced payments violate a public-sector employee’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association.

“Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion.

Kelsey said the now-illegal practice was the exact opposite of the right-to-work law the groups support. Right-to-work laws allow individuals to work in public jobs and receive the same benefits as union workers but without paying dues to the labor organization representing the workers.

Pennsylvania is one of 23 states that does not have a right-to-work law on its books.

The Pennsylvania workers’ lawsuit seeks a refund of the “fair share” fees nonunion employees paid between Nov. 7, 2017, and June 27, 2018. Dues paid prior to that cannot be collected because of the statute of limitations.

They are also seeking to make this a class-action lawsuit.

A message to AFSCME Council 13 Executive Director David Fillman was not returned.

However, in a statement after the lawsuit was filed, Fillman criticized the case, saying it was supported by “dark money” special-interest groups.

“We will combat this attack on the workers who keep our commonwealth operating just as we have always done,” he said. “Liberty Justice Center poses as helping public employees; however, their goal is to eliminate public sector employee protections altogether.”

Kelsey denied the assertion this and similar cases are an attempt to eradicate unions.

“What we’re doing is we’re representing workers, and in particular, we’re representing workers who had their rights abused by unions,” he said. “And it’s time for the unions to pay this money back that they unconstitutionally took.”

This is one of two such cases that the center and foundation have filed in Pennsylvania. The other involves state workers seeking repayment from a Service Employees International Union local chapter.

Similar lawsuits have also been filed in Maryland and Illinois.

“We plan to file more,” added Kelsey, who also said he expects the AFSCME case to eventually go before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

posted here with permission of

The Center Square

Acreage Holdings Looking at $317M in Medical Cannabis Sales with Purchase of NJ Compassionate Care

Company Release – 11/18/2019 7:30 AM ET

NEW YORK, Nov. 18, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Acreage Holdings, Inc. (“Acreage”) (CSE: ACRG.U) (OTC: ACRGF) (FSE: 0ZV) announced that on November 15, certain of its subsidiaries and Compassionate Care Foundation, Inc. (“CCF”), a New Jersey vertically integrated cannabis nonprofit corporation, entered into a Reorganization Agreement, pursuant to which Acreage will acquire 100% of the equity interests in CCF, and subsequently consolidate their financials.  Closing of the transaction is subject to state approval.

With a population of approximately nine million, New Jersey is estimated to generate $317 million in legal medical cannabis sales by 2022, according to Arcview Market Research.

“I’m thrilled to finally welcome CCF into the Acreage family,” said Kevin Murphy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Acreage.  “This reorganization will result in increased access to affordable medical cannabis for New Jersey’s existing patients in short order.  Moreover, we have long believed that upon adult-use legalization, the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions will be the preeminent cannabis market in the U.S. and Acreage is best positioned of any U.S. cannabis company to benefit.”

CCF Operations

:

CCF’s vertically integrated operations include licenses for cultivation, manufacturing & processing, and three retail dispensaries. A description of the operations follows:

Cultivation:

CCF operates one of New Jersey’s largest indoor growing facilities, primarily for high end flower, in Egg Harbor, NJ.  Acreage and CCF are planning to expand this facility to serve the existing demand for medical cannabis and in anticipation of adult-use legalization, and to build out a robust wholesale business.

Retail Dispensary Operations:

CCF has the potential to operate three retail dispensaries, one of which is currently in operation in Egg Harbor.  An additional dispensary is under construction in Atlantic City as The Botanist, and an letter of intent has been signed for another The Botanist dispensary in Williamstown, NJ.

ABOUT ACREAGE

Headquartered in New York City, Acreage is one of the largest vertically integrated, multi-state operators of cannabis licenses and assets in the U.S., according to publicly available information. Acreage owns licenses to operate or has management or consulting services or other agreements in place with license holders to assist in operations in 20 states (including pending acquisitions) with a population of approximately 180 million Americans, and an estimated 2022 total addressable market of $16.7 billion in legal cannabis sales, according to Arcview Market Research. Acreage is dedicated to building and scaling operations to create a seamless, consumer-focused branded cannabis experience. Acreage\’s national retail store brand, The Botanist, debuted in 2018.

On June 27, 2019 Acreage implemented an arrangement under section 288 of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “Arrangement”) with Canopy Growth Corporation (“Canopy Growth”). Pursuant to the Arrangement, the Acreage articles were amended to provide Canopy Growth with an option to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares in the capital of Acreage, with a requirement to do so, upon a change in federal laws in the United States to permit the general cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana (as defined in the relevant legislation) or to remove the regulation of such activities from the federal laws of the United States (the “Triggering Event”), subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set out in the arrangement agreement entered into between Acreage and Canopy Growth on April 18, 2019, as amended on May 15, 2019 (the “Arrangement Agreement”). Acreage will continue to operate as a stand-alone entity and to conduct its business independently, subject to compliance with certain covenants contained in the Arrangement Agreement. Upon the occurrence or waiver of the Triggering Event, Canopy Growth will exercise the option and, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions to closing set out in the Arrangement Agreement, acquire (the “Acquisition”) each of the Subordinate Voting Shares (following the automatic conversion of the Class B proportionate voting shares and Class C multiple voting shares of Acreage into Subordinate Voting Shares) in exchange for the payment of 0.5818 of a common share of Canopy Growth per Subordinate Voting Share (subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Arrangement Agreement). If the Acquisition is completed, Canopy Growth will acquire all of the Acreage Shares, Acreage will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Canopy Growth and Canopy Growth will continue the operations of Canopy Growth and Acreage on a combined basis. For more information about the Arrangement and the Acquisition please see the respective information circulars of each of Acreage and Canopy Growth dated May 17, 2019, which are available on Canopy Growth’s and Acreage’s respective profiles on SEDAR at

www.sedar.com

. For additional information regarding Canopy Growth, please see Canopy Growth’s profile on SEDAR at

www.sedar.com

.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release and each of the documents referred to herein contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking information, including, for greater certainty, statements regarding the proposed transaction with Canopy Growth, including the anticipated benefits and likelihood of completion thereof.

Generally, forward-looking information may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “proposed”, “is expected”, “budgets”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases, or by the use of words or phrases which state that certain actions, events or results may, could, would, or might occur or be achieved. There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking information. This forward-looking information reflects Acreage’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to Acreage and on assumptions Acreage believes are reasonable. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Acreage to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such risks and other factors may include, but are not limited to: the ability of the parties to receive, in a timely manner and on satisfactory terms, the necessary regulatory approvals; the available funds of Acreage and the anticipated use of such funds; the availability of financing opportunities; the ability of Acreage and Canopy Growth to satisfy, in a timely manner, the conditions to the completion of the Acquisition; the likelihood of completion of the Acquisition; other expectations and assumptions concerning the transactions contemplated between Acreage and Canopy Growth; legal and regulatory risks inherent in the cannabis industry; risks associated with economic conditions, dependence on management and currency risk; risks relating to U.S. regulatory landscape and enforcement related to cannabis, including political risks; risks relating to anti-money laundering laws and regulation; other governmental and environmental regulation; public opinion and perception of the cannabis industry; risks related to contracts with third-party service providers; risks related to the enforceability of contracts; reliance on the expertise and judgment of senior management of Acreage; risks related to proprietary intellectual property and potential infringement by third parties; the concentrated voting control of Acreage’s founder and the unpredictability caused by Acreage’s capital structure; risks relating to the management of growth; increasing competition in the industry; risks inherent in an agricultural business; risks relating to energy costs; risks associated to cannabis products manufactured for human consumption including potential product recalls; reliance on key inputs, suppliers and skilled labor; cybersecurity risks; ability and constraints on marketing products; fraudulent activity by employees, contractors and consultants; tax and insurance related risks; risks related to the economy generally; risk of litigation; conflicts of interest; risks relating to certain remedies being limited and the difficulty of enforcement of judgments and effect service outside of Canada; risks related to future acquisitions or dispositions; sales by existing shareholders; and limited research and data relating to cannabis. A description of additional assumptions used to develop such forward-looking information and a description of additional risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking information can be found in Acreage’s disclosure documents, including the Circular and Acreage’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed on April 29, 2019, on the SEDAR website at

www.sedar.com

. Although Acreage has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Readers are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which they are placed will occur. Forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The forward-looking information contained in this news release represents the expectations of Acreage as of the date of this news release and, accordingly, is subject to change after such date. However, Acreage expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as expressly required by applicable securities law.

Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider has reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the content of this news release.

Cinnaminson Drug Dealer Charged with Causing Death of Palmyra Customer

Burlington County Prosecutor Scott Coffina and Palmyra Borough Police Chief Scott Pearlman announced that a Cinnaminson drug dealer was arrested

today for causing the death of a customer who fatally overdosed during the summer on heroin that she sold to him earlier that day.

Colleen Wedge, 29, of the 700 block of Foxcroft Drive in Cinnaminson, was charged with Strict Liability for Drug-Induced Death (First Degree), Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Third Degree), Distribution of a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Third Degree) and Conspiracy to Distribute Heroin (Third Degree).

Wedge surrendered this morning at the Palmyra Borough Police Department. The case will now be prepared for presentation to a grand jury for possible indictment.

The investigation began after officers from the Palmyra Borough Police Department were called to a house on West Fifth Street on August 9 for an unattended death. Upon arrival, they discovered the body of a 31-year-old male on the floor of his bedroom. Empty baggies of heroin were found in the bedroom.

The investigation revealed that Wedge had sold heroin to the victim on numerous occasions, including four bags on the day of his fatal overdose for which he paid $50.

An autopsy performed by Burlington County Medical Examiner Dr. Ian Hood concluded the cause of death was heroin and fentanyl toxicity.

Wedge will be prosecuted by Assistant Prosecutor Jeremy Lackey. The investigation was conducted by the Palmyra Borough Police Department and the BCPO Gang, Gun and Narcotics Task Force, with assistance from the BCPO High-Tech Crimes Unit.

All persons are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Maple Shade Used Car Dealer Faces Criminal Charges

Burlington County Prosecutor Scott Coffina and Maple Shade Police Chief Christopher Fletcher announced that a Maple Shade used car dealer has been charged with altering temporary license plates that were provided to

customers in an effort to conceal the fact that he sold vehicles for which he did not have possession of the title of ownership.

Gavry Nelson, 36, of Medford Lane in Willingboro, was charged with two counts of Forgery (Third Degree) and two counts of Tampering (Fourth Degree). He was also issued a summons for placing counterfeit license plates on a motor vehicle.

Arrangements are being made for Nelson to surrender himself to the Maple Shade Police Department to be processed on the charges. The case will then be prepared for presentation to a grand jury for possible indictment.

The investigation began after a Maple Shade Police Department patrol officer pulled over a vehicle for having a temporary license plate with an altered expiration date.

The investigation revealed that Nelson, the owner of The Automotive Outlet at Route 38 and Stiles Avenue, was selling vehicles he had obtained at auctions even though he was unable to take possession of the title because the vehicles had liens placed on them.

Nelson did not disclose to the buyers that he was selling a vehicle without possession of the title. In attempt to cover his actions, Nelson would repeatedly provide the purchasers with new temporary license plates that had been altered to extend the expiration date. His failure to secure the titles meant that those who purchased the vehicles were unable to register them with the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, which has opened an investigation into Nelson’s actions.

Consumers who suspect they have been victimized by this business are asked to call the Maple Shade Police Department at 856-234-8300.

The lead investigators on the case are Maple Shade Patrol Officers Justin Jericho and Anthony King.

All persons are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Lawsuit seeks return of \’fair-share\’ fees paid by Pennsylvania state non-union workers

<div class=\”entry-body\”>
<div class=\”asset-photo card\”>
<figure class=\”photo layout-horizontal hover-expand\”>
<div class=\”photo-wrap photo-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” id=\”photo-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” style=\”display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 350px;\”>
<a class=\”asset-img-link\” href=\”https://www.gloucestercitynews.net/.a/6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d-popup\” onclick=\”window.open( this.href, \’_blank\’, \’width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0\’ ); return false\”>
<img alt=\”Screen Shot 2019-11-19 at 19.25.39\” class=\”asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d img-responsive\” src=\”https://www.gloucestercitynews.net/.a/6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d-350wi\” style=\”width: 350px;\” title=\”Screen Shot 2019-11-19 at 19.25.39\”/>
</a>
<div class=\”photo-caption caption-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” id=\”caption-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\”>
Members of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees union listen to AFSCME Council 31 executive director Henry Bayer speak during a forum in this 2012 file photo. Seth Perlman | AP file photo
</div>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
<div class=\”tncms-region hidden-print\” id=\”tncms-region-article_top_content\”>
<ul class=\”list-inline\”>
<li>
<span class=\”tnt-byline asset-byline\” data-original-title=\”\” id=\”author-popup-87534f0c-2ee7-11e9-8d44-0fc3eb274bcc-asset-a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” title=\”\”>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/users/profile/Steve%20Bittenbender\”>
By Steve Bittenbender |
</a>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/\”>
The Center Square
</a>
</span>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div data-asset-uuid=\”a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” id=\”asset-content\”>
<div class=\”row\”>
<div class=\”col-lg-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12\” data-subscription-required-class=\”col-xs-12\”>
<div class=\”asset-body\” data-subscription-required-class=\”asset-body\”>
<div class=\”asset-content subscriber-premium\”>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
One of the plaintiffs in the case is David Schaszberger. He served as a statistical analyst for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry for a decade but voluntarily chose not to join the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 13, the local union representing more than 65,000 public-sector workers.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The Liberty Justice Center estimates Schaszberger had to pay the union more than $4,000 in order to hold his job.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit comes in the wake of a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, an Illinois case filed by the same groups, that overturned the practice of public-sector unions collecting what they called “fair share” fees from workers who opted not to join. The unions maintained the fees were necessary to cover the costs of negotiating collective bargaining agreements, which covered both union and nonunion employees alike.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“The Supreme Court has already decided with us and with the workers,” said Brian Kelsey, a Liberty Justice Center senior attorney. “Now we’re just asking the courts to make the union pay up for what they took.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
In the 5-4 decision, the nation’s top court ruled such forced payments violate a public-sector employee’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Kelsey said the now-illegal practice was the exact opposite of the right-to-work law the groups support. Right-to-work laws allow individuals to work in public jobs and receive the same benefits as union workers but without paying dues to the labor organization representing the workers.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Pennsylvania is one of 23 states that does not have a right-to-work law on its books.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The Pennsylvania workers’ lawsuit seeks a refund of the “fair share” fees nonunion employees paid between Nov. 7, 2017, and June 27, 2018. Dues paid prior to that cannot be collected because of the statute of limitations.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
They are also seeking to make this a class-action lawsuit.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
A message to AFSCME Council 13 Executive Director David Fillman was not returned.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
However, in a statement after the lawsuit was filed, Fillman criticized the case, saying it was supported by “dark money” special-interest groups.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“We will combat this attack on the workers who keep our commonwealth operating just as we have always done,” he said. “Liberty Justice Center poses as helping public employees; however, their goal is to eliminate public sector employee protections altogether.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Kelsey denied the assertion this and similar cases are an attempt to eradicate unions.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“What we’re doing is we’re representing workers, and in particular, we’re representing workers who had their rights abused by unions,” he said. “And it’s time for the unions to pay this money back that they unconstitutionally took.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
This is one of two such cases that the center and foundation have filed in Pennsylvania. The other involves state workers seeking repayment from a Service Employees International Union local chapter.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Similar lawsuits have also been filed in Maryland and Illinois.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“We plan to file more,” added Kelsey, who also said he expects the AFSCME case to eventually go before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
</span>
</p>
<p>
posted here with permission of
<span class=\”tnt-byline asset-byline\” data-original-title=\”\” id=\”author-popup-87534f0c-2ee7-11e9-8d44-0fc3eb274bcc-asset-a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” title=\”\”>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/\”>
The Center Square
</a>
</span>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Lawsuit seeks return of \’fair-share\’ fees paid by Pennsylvania state non-union workers

<div class=\”entry-body\”>
<div class=\”asset-photo card\”>
<figure class=\”photo layout-horizontal hover-expand\”>
<div class=\”photo-wrap photo-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” id=\”photo-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” style=\”display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 350px;\”>
<a class=\”asset-img-link\” href=\”https://www.gloucestercitynews.net/.a/6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d-popup\” onclick=\”window.open( this.href, \’_blank\’, \’width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0\’ ); return false\”>
<img alt=\”Screen Shot 2019-11-19 at 19.25.39\” class=\”asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d img-responsive\” src=\”https://www.gloucestercitynews.net/.a/6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d-350wi\” style=\”width: 350px;\” title=\”Screen Shot 2019-11-19 at 19.25.39\”/>
</a>
<div class=\”photo-caption caption-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\” id=\”caption-xid-6a00d8341bf7d953ef0240a4c8140f200d\”>
Members of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees union listen to AFSCME Council 31 executive director Henry Bayer speak during a forum in this 2012 file photo. Seth Perlman | AP file photo
</div>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
<div class=\”tncms-region hidden-print\” id=\”tncms-region-article_top_content\”>
<ul class=\”list-inline\”>
<li>
<span class=\”tnt-byline asset-byline\” data-original-title=\”\” id=\”author-popup-87534f0c-2ee7-11e9-8d44-0fc3eb274bcc-asset-a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” title=\”\”>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/users/profile/Steve%20Bittenbender\”>
By Steve Bittenbender |
</a>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/\”>
The Center Square
</a>
</span>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div data-asset-uuid=\”a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” id=\”asset-content\”>
<div class=\”row\”>
<div class=\”col-lg-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12\” data-subscription-required-class=\”col-xs-12\”>
<div class=\”asset-body\” data-subscription-required-class=\”asset-body\”>
<div class=\”asset-content subscriber-premium\”>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Seven current and former Pennsylvania state employees have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to get back dues they claim they were forced to pay to a union that did not represent them.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
If they’re successful, approximately 10,000 people could end up getting $3 million back.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit was filed this month in Pennsylvania’s U.S. Middle District Court by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan “litigation center” that seeks to protect the right to work or create a business for anyone, and the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
One of the plaintiffs in the case is David Schaszberger. He served as a statistical analyst for the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry for a decade but voluntarily chose not to join the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 13, the local union representing more than 65,000 public-sector workers.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The Liberty Justice Center estimates Schaszberger had to pay the union more than $4,000 in order to hold his job.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The lawsuit comes in the wake of a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, an Illinois case filed by the same groups, that overturned the practice of public-sector unions collecting what they called “fair share” fees from workers who opted not to join. The unions maintained the fees were necessary to cover the costs of negotiating collective bargaining agreements, which covered both union and nonunion employees alike.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“The Supreme Court has already decided with us and with the workers,” said Brian Kelsey, a Liberty Justice Center senior attorney. “Now we’re just asking the courts to make the union pay up for what they took.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
In the 5-4 decision, the nation’s top court ruled such forced payments violate a public-sector employee’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Kelsey said the now-illegal practice was the exact opposite of the right-to-work law the groups support. Right-to-work laws allow individuals to work in public jobs and receive the same benefits as union workers but without paying dues to the labor organization representing the workers.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Pennsylvania is one of 23 states that does not have a right-to-work law on its books.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
The Pennsylvania workers’ lawsuit seeks a refund of the “fair share” fees nonunion employees paid between Nov. 7, 2017, and June 27, 2018. Dues paid prior to that cannot be collected because of the statute of limitations.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
They are also seeking to make this a class-action lawsuit.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
A message to AFSCME Council 13 Executive Director David Fillman was not returned.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
However, in a statement after the lawsuit was filed, Fillman criticized the case, saying it was supported by “dark money” special-interest groups.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“We will combat this attack on the workers who keep our commonwealth operating just as we have always done,” he said. “Liberty Justice Center poses as helping public employees; however, their goal is to eliminate public sector employee protections altogether.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Kelsey denied the assertion this and similar cases are an attempt to eradicate unions.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“What we’re doing is we’re representing workers, and in particular, we’re representing workers who had their rights abused by unions,” he said. “And it’s time for the unions to pay this money back that they unconstitutionally took.”
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
This is one of two such cases that the center and foundation have filed in Pennsylvania. The other involves state workers seeking repayment from a Service Employees International Union local chapter.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
Similar lawsuits have also been filed in Maryland and Illinois.
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style=\”font-family: verdana, geneva; font-size: 12pt;\”>
“We plan to file more,” added Kelsey, who also said he expects the AFSCME case to eventually go before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
</span>
</p>
<p>
posted here with permission of
<span class=\”tnt-byline asset-byline\” data-original-title=\”\” id=\”author-popup-87534f0c-2ee7-11e9-8d44-0fc3eb274bcc-asset-a9731612-0a0b-11ea-997f-8355f29a098a\” title=\”\”>
<a href=\”https://www.thecentersquare.com/\”>
The Center Square
</a>
</span>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

5 Key Upgrades For Your Business

Gloucestercitynews.net (Nov. 21, 2019)–A smart business owner will always be looking for upgrades to boost their brand. Things can change quickly in the business world, and being able to update and stay current is critical for staying ahead of the competition and satisfying your customers. Even a minor upgrade could have a big impact on the success of your brand, so it is always worth considering any kind of positive change, no matter how big or small. With this in mind, here are a few upgrades to consider, which could help your business and keep you ahead of the curve.

1.Chat

It needs to be easy for your target customer to get in touch with you so that they can get questions answered. If it is hard to contact your team and/or it takes too long to receive a response, then they will simply take their business elsewhere, which is why having a live chat function is so valuable and a simple upgrade that you can easily make.

Continue reading “5 Key Upgrades For Your Business”

Jogger was Attacked at Haddon Lake Park, Mount Ephraim on Sunday, November 11


MOUNT EPHRAIM, NJ (November 12,2018)(CNBNewsnet)–Mount Ephraim Chief of  Police Brian Conte released the following information about an assault at the Haddon Lake Park on Kings Highway on Sunday, November 11. 

On November 11th, 2018 at approximately 7:00pm, the Mount Ephraim Police Department received a call for an assault at Haddon Lake Park. An adult female reported that while running the track around the lake, she was grabbed from behind by an unknown male and forced into a struggle. The victim was able to get away from the assailant, thankfully suffering only minor scrapes and abrasions. As she fled the scene, the victim observed a male wearing a puffy black hooded sweatshirt, black pants, possibly a mask and black shoes; running into the wooded area towards the Mount Ephraim Little League baseball fields.

Continue reading “Jogger was Attacked at Haddon Lake Park, Mount Ephraim on Sunday, November 11”

ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT’S WEEKLY COLUMN: Philadelphia Inquirer Article is Seriously Flawed

To the Philadelphia Catholic community:

Dear friends,

Every once in awhile a story circulates in the press that requires a response.  That is my purpose here.

Many of you may have seen the article in the November 12 Philadelphia Inquirer focusing on Stephen Szutenbach, a former Denver seminarian, and his adult sexual encounters with Kent Drotar.  Father Drotar was vice rector of Denver’s St. John Vianney Seminary for a time during my tenure as Archbishop of Denver.  If you haven’t read the Inquirer story, I encourage you to do so:

http://www2.philly.com/philly/news/catholic-sex-abuse-seminarians-chaput-denver-szutenbach-bishops-vianney-20181112.html

 I mention this because Denver archdiocesan conduct and safety policies were followed at all times in this painful matter, and the Inquirer article is seriously flawed in at least two of its key elements.  The truth is that:

 * Father Kent Drotar was removed from ministry on the counsel of the Archdiocese of Denver’s review board — not because of anyone’s threat, at any time, to go to the press.

 * No staff person’s contract was terminated or not renewed because of the Szutenbach/Drotar incident.  At no point was “retaliation” involved against any person. 
Continue reading “ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT’S WEEKLY COLUMN: Philadelphia Inquirer Article is Seriously Flawed”

Tom Goldschmidt – Teacher Extraordinare

by Gus Danks | GCHS Alumnus Class of ’63

Tom was my English teacher at Gloucester Catholic High School in South Jersey fifty-five years ago. He died last week at the age of eighty-one. He graduated first in his class at Villanova many years ago and came back for a few years to his former high school to teach us and to serve as an excellent role model.

I told Tom on a few occasions that he was the best teacher I ever had – in high school or in college. He was an excellent lecturer and an elevating presence to students like me, who surely were in need of some elevation. He continued in teaching for many years at Moorestown High School before moving into the real estate industry.

Continue reading “Tom Goldschmidt – Teacher Extraordinare”